From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8743B7F7B for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:19:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F823304064 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id avjdA8FQz1BmgQGk for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52827113.3080609@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:18:59 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: stop special casing nfs and udf References: <20131107204635.GA22954@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20131107204635.GA22954@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/7/13, 2:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > For historical reasons beyond my knowledge xfstests tries to abuse the > scratch device as test device for nfs and udf. Because not all test > have inherited the right usage of the _setup_testdir and _cleanup_testdir > helpers this leads to lots of unessecary test failures. > > Remove the special casing, which gets nfs down to a minimal number of > failures. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Oof, that was a lot of cruft. Were you able to run UDF tests with these changes? I wonder if Jan is using this for UDF? (I don't have the UDF verifier that many(/all?) of the UDF tests require). -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs