From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD307F90 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:23:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F94A30406A for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:23:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PGoNAnl3vlkGBMoC for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:23:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52827239.9060307@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:23:53 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: stop special casing nfs and udf References: <20131107204635.GA22954@infradead.org> <52827113.3080609@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <52827113.3080609@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Jan Kara On 11/12/13, 12:18 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 11/7/13, 2:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> For historical reasons beyond my knowledge xfstests tries to abuse the >> scratch device as test device for nfs and udf. Because not all test >> have inherited the right usage of the _setup_testdir and _cleanup_testdir >> helpers this leads to lots of unessecary test failures. >> >> Remove the special casing, which gets nfs down to a minimal number of >> failures. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > Oof, that was a lot of cruft. Were you able to run UDF tests with > these changes? I wonder if Jan is using this for UDF? > > (I don't have the UDF verifier that many(/all?) of the UDF tests > require). (Should have cc'd Jan, done now) > -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs