From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06927F93 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:49:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F59AC010 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oEWEt1ENNrQi5oW7 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:49:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52866CC7.3090406@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:49:43 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] xfs_fsr fixes References: <5261B11F.1040000@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5261B11F.1040000@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss On 10/18/13, 5:07 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > This is to fix the problem w/ xfs_fsr demonstrated by the > testcase I just sent. Ping? > -Eric > > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs