public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] xfs: implement parallism quota check
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:41:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528A0AE5.40702@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131118110449.GB1304@infradead.org>

On 11/18 2013 07:04 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 09:01:08PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> On 11/16 2013 01:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> As Dave pointed out this really should be xfs_bukstat_ag.  But looking
>>> at the code you're almost 90% there anyway.
>> One main reason I did not make a per ag bulkstat is because bulkstat() will
>> skip an allocation group if read agi buffer failed, i.e,
>>
>> while (XFS_BULKSTAT_UBLEFT(ubleft) && agno < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount) {
>> 	cond_resched();
>> 	error = xfs_ialloc_read_agi(mp, NULL, agno, &agbp);
>> 	if (error) {
>> 		/*
>> 		 * Skip this allocation group and go to the next one.
>> 		 */
>> 		agno++;
>>                 agino = 0;
>> 		continue;
>> 	}
>> 	....
>> }
>>
>> Should it capture this issue and drop a warning in this case?
> 
> I've been thinking hard about this, but I can't really see any reason
> why we would skip an AG instead of propagating the error.  The only
> error xfs_ialloc_read_agi can return is an I/O error from reading
> the buffer from disk, and we'd really want to propagate that sort
> of I/O errror.  I'd suggest a patch at the beginning of the series
> to just change that behavior for all the two places in bulkstat that
> call xfs_ialloc_read_agi.  None of the other callers seem to behave
> this way either.

Ok, thanks for clearing up my confusion.

Thanks,
-Jeff

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2013-11-18 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-12  9:30 [RFC PATCH 4/4] xfs: implement parallism quota check Jeff Liu
2013-11-15 17:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-17 13:01   ` Jeff Liu
2013-11-18 11:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-18 12:41       ` Jeff Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528A0AE5.40702@oracle.com \
    --to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox