From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: introduce xfs_ialloc_blks_per_cluster
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:22:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A91DC8.7010405@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131211231409.GN10988@dastard>
On 12/12 2013 07:14 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:48:01PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>>
>> Introduce a common routine xfs_ialloc_blks_per_cluster() to calculate
>> and return the number of blocks per inode cluster.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h
>> index a8f76a5..f4bfd32 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h
>> @@ -37,6 +37,16 @@ struct xfs_btree_cur;
>> #define XFS_INODE_BIG_CLUSTER_SIZE 8192
>> #define XFS_INODE_CLUSTER_SIZE(mp) (mp)->m_inode_cluster_size
>>
>> +/* Calculate and return the number of blocks per inode cluster */
>> +static inline int
>> +xfs_ialloc_blks_per_cluster(
>> + struct xfs_mount *mp)
>> +{
>> + if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize >= XFS_INODE_CLUSTER_SIZE(mp))
>> + return 1;
>> + return XFS_INODE_CLUSTER_SIZE(mp) >> mp->m_sb.sb_blocklog;
>> +}
>
> I'd avoid using the XFS_INODE_CLUSTER_SIZE() macro - it's just a
> useless wrapper around mp->m_inode_cluster_size. Hence if you are
> cleaning this code up, the first thing I'd do is remove the macro.
>
> /* Calculate and return the number of blocks per inode cluster */
> static inline int
> xfs_ialloc_blks_per_cluster(
> struct xfs_mount *mp)
> {
> if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize >= mp->m_inode_cluster_size)
> return 1;
> return mp->m_inode_cluster_size >> mp->m_sb.sb_blocklog;
> }
>
> Is much less shouty, and just as easy to read ;)
Yup, yup! I also considered to just remove this macros as mp->m_inode_cluster_size
is quite understood and actually, we avoid this macros in xfs_inobp_check(). :)
But that means I need to remove it from xlog_recover_buffer_pass2() and fix it's
comments in this patch as well.
Thanks,
-Jeff
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 13:48 [PATCH 1/5] xfs: introduce xfs_ialloc_blks_per_cluster Jeff Liu
2013-12-11 23:14 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-12 2:22 ` Jeff Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A91DC8.7010405@oracle.com \
--to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox