From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CF97F3F for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:29:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas2-dc21.corp.sgi.com [137.38.106.9]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7122AC00D for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:29:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52B32CE0.5070701@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:29:04 -0600 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] Userspace and xfstests releases References: <52B06E51.1020504@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <52B06E51.1020504@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-oss On 12/17/2013 09:31 AM, Rich Johnston wrote: > I was planning on a xfsdump and xfstests release this week before I go > on vacation. Any objections? Currently xfstests is not released, should this be changed? I will wait until I return on Jan 2 to release xfsprogs. > > Release versions for xfsprogs are still being discussed. Are there any > more comments on this subject? Here is one of the threads discussing this. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00421.html Christoph were you saying you create xfsprogs branches? Is there a consensus on version names/branches for xfsprogs? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs