From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41F029DF8 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:44:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAFC8F8050 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1G9VGYr8uR8CcQVh for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:44:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52D36F19.3070207@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:44:09 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Add pairing mount options test References: <1389162648-19309-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> <52D01CA9.4040107@sandeen.net> <52D33F92.2000609@cn.fujitsu.com> <52D342F0.5020402@sandeen.net> <20140113015239.GD3469@dastard> <52D34EBD.4020508@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140113032650.GH3469@dastard> <52D364DA.4000708@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <52D364DA.4000708@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Qu Wenruo , Dave Chinner Cc: Eric Sandeen , linux-btrfs , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 1/12/14, 10:00 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Now I'm interested in how other filesystems like xfs makes sure that every pairing > mount options are tested. For starters, xfs actually doesn't handle very many options during remount. Many of them are quite tricky to do, which made me wonder if they all actually worked properly for btrfs. :) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs