* [PATCH] xfs/199: enforce v4 superblock format for test
@ 2014-01-21 11:10 Dave Chinner
2014-01-22 9:53 ` Jeff Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-01-21 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
This test relies of the contents of the sb_features2 field being
known. Make sure ot clear allt eh MKFS_OPTIONS and ensure that we
direct mkfs to create only the simplest of featuresets to test this
functionality.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
tests/xfs/199 | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/xfs/199 b/tests/xfs/199
index 1d64e02..c1b5962 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/199
+++ b/tests/xfs/199
@@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ _supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
-_scratch_mkfs_xfs -l lazy-count=1 >/dev/null 2>&1
+# clear any mkfs options so taht we can directly specify the options we need to
+# be able to test the features bitmask behaviour correctly.
+MKFS_OPTIONS=
+_scratch_mkfs_xfs -l lazy-count=1 -i projid32bit=0 >/dev/null 2>&1
#
# Print the current flags. Just a dummy so that the test breaks
--
1.8.4.rc3
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs/199: enforce v4 superblock format for test
2014-01-21 11:10 [PATCH] xfs/199: enforce v4 superblock format for test Dave Chinner
@ 2014-01-22 9:53 ` Jeff Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Liu @ 2014-01-22 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner, xfs
On 01/21 2014 19:10 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> This test relies of the contents of the sb_features2 field being
> known. Make sure ot clear allt eh MKFS_OPTIONS and ensure that we
> direct mkfs to create only the simplest of featuresets to test this
> functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/xfs/199 | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/199 b/tests/xfs/199
> index 1d64e02..c1b5962 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/199
> +++ b/tests/xfs/199
> @@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ _supported_os Linux
>
> _require_scratch
>
> -_scratch_mkfs_xfs -l lazy-count=1 >/dev/null 2>&1
> +# clear any mkfs options so taht we can directly specify the options we need to
^^^
a typo...
> +# be able to test the features bitmask behaviour correctly.
> +MKFS_OPTIONS=
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs -l lazy-count=1 -i projid32bit=0 >/dev/null 2>&1
>
> #
> # Print the current flags. Just a dummy so that the test breaks
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Thanks,
-Jeff
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-22 9:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-21 11:10 [PATCH] xfs/199: enforce v4 superblock format for test Dave Chinner
2014-01-22 9:53 ` Jeff Liu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).