linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases?
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:38:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DFD801.40801@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140121234151.GJ13997@dastard>

On 01/21/14 17:41, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 of January 2014, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:08:14PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:02:59AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>>> Well, that's always been the plan since a 3.1.12 release was
>>>>> proposed 3 months ago. How well has that plan been working out so
>>>>> far?
>>>>
>>>> The sad part is that I would have had the time 3 month ago, but right
>>>> now it's hard.  Still trying to get it done, though.
>>>
>>> If Arkadiusz is willing to provide a list of commits to include it
>>> shouldn't be a problem to get this done.  I believe he indicated a
>>> willingness to help on IRC earlier today.
>>
>> By looking into git log these look like small fixes for 3.1.x. Could someone else recheck?
>>
> .....
>> 3a19fb7dce9d570e78deaf5c26c0ab8a4a5bef67 libxfs: stop caching inode structures
>> 61510437c627b529feb95ebffddd73df5ed5b104 repair: prefetching is turned off unnecessarily
>> 0cce4aa198f0470817bedb3781ea5b6955e43076 repair: Increase default repair parallelism on large filesystems
>
> I think these three are not a great idea for 3.1.x. They result in
> significant changes of behaviour that can result in increased memory
> consumption by default. I'd prefer that we don't make changes to the
> default behaviour in a bug-fix only point release.
>
> .....
>> Not sure about these:
>>
>> 1ba28b64e69ce3a7989df88f71a5cb608b1c71e3 xfs_repair: drop buffer reference on symlink error
>> 4e503735fd407e2e61295e6af6ec47af4693bc95 xfs_repair: fix btree block magic number mapping
>> 4fbebf374ccc178f1fedcf2d8a43339031f8dbb4 libxfs: fix dir3 freespace block corruption
>> 494434d7fb79840ba113ecd7fb1ac3ae20e0f569 xfs: Add read-only support for dirent filetype field
>> 906b762f55333968321062642a0b90feac1fdffb xfs: Add write support for dirent filetype field
>> 3beed08eb22f56b384d2028541ccb41284ff9751 xfsprogs: add dtype support to mkfs and db
>> 1acc538540ce22e16bb55ca573691070a8d375db xfsprogs: initialize filetype for xfs_name_dot
>> 41315687d9db9b50876401e7b0ee20dd77cfc712 xfs: dirent dtype presence is dependent on directory magic numbers
>> 68774b900e0c8368342cb12f649572a86ef2f6e4 xfsprogs: initialize filetype for lost+found creation
>> 2cca1dbd1c3e12d270a9baa5f85e548e8a5a2125 xfs_repair: add d_type when moving files to lost+found
>> 87e343bd0937e5bb75dd8bc46ba388b6f8c6552b xfsprog: add xfs sb v4 support for dirent filetype field
>> 6f700630b06a2ce15aebe8608b2c5877002299d6 xfsprog: add dirent filetype information for xfs_info
>> 42737f1ad16213a3dab1756c9fffb494db8ef27e xfs_progs: add dirent filetype to xfs_db version
>> 4eb02d95b7e081b510a7015609f01385aab229a9 xfsprog: add mkfs.xfs sb v4 support for dirent filetype field
>
> I'd say not to the dirent filetype changes.  They require the CRC
> format enabled directory code and that basically involves
> backporting the entire 3.2-alpha code base to support it. Otherwise
> a complete re-implementation in needed for 3.1.x, not a backport.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.

Thanks for making the list. I agree with Dave above about 3 feature 
patches and the directory file type changes.

The following patch that is in your "not sure" list looks like a good 
bug fix that is not CRC related:

ba28b64e69ce3a7989df88f71a5cb608b1c71e3 xfs_repair: drop buffer 
reference on symlink error

--Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-22 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-20 17:22 xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases? Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-20 22:30 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-20 22:42   ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-20 23:02     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-20 23:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-20 23:11         ` Ben Myers
2014-01-21  8:17           ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-21 23:41             ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-22 14:38               ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2014-01-22 14:54                 ` Mark Tinguely
2014-01-22 14:48               ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-22 23:03                 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23 22:37                   ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-21  8:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-27 18:46 ` [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs for-3.1.12 branch has been updated to 40c65a7 Rich Johnston
2014-01-28  4:20   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28 15:36     ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-28 16:54       ` Ben Myers
2014-01-28 20:17       ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28  4:42   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28 15:33     ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-28 20:15       ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28 17:29     ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-30 19:20       ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-30 20:20         ` Eric Sandeen
2014-01-30 20:58           ` Rich Johnston
2014-02-19 19:18   ` Rich Johnston
2014-02-19 21:50     ` Dave Chinner
2014-03-14 15:28       ` Rich Johnston
2014-04-07 18:20 ` xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases? Rich Johnston
2014-04-07 23:30   ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-08 12:38     ` Rich Johnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52DFD801.40801@sgi.com \
    --to=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).