From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F039C7F7C for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:54:54 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <52DFDBBF.50803@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:54:55 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases? References: <201401201822.48520.arekm@maven.pl> <20140120230814.GA4287@infradead.org> <20140120231158.GL1935@sgi.com> <201401210917.38674.arekm@maven.pl> <20140121234151.GJ13997@dastard> <52DFD801.40801@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <52DFD801.40801@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 01/22/14 08:38, Mark Tinguely wrote: ... > Thanks for making the list. I agree with Dave above about 3 feature > patches and the directory file type changes. > > The following patch that is in your "not sure" list looks like a good > bug fix that is not CRC related: > > ba28b64e69ce3a7989df88f71a5cb608b1c71e3 xfs_repair: drop buffer > reference on symlink error > Take that back, if (fsbno == NULLDFSBNO) then bp will be NULL also. So we do not want to do the libxfs_putbuf()... this patch is not appropriate for 3.1.12. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs