* [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
@ 2014-01-24 2:58 Dave Chinner
2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-01-24 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs; +Cc: linux-ext4, linux-btrfs
Hi all,
The xfstests repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests has
just been updated. Patches often get missed, so please check if your
outstanding patches were in this update. If they have not been in
this update, please resubmit them to xfs@oss.sgi.com so they can be
picked up in the next update.
The new head of the master branch is commit:
197f773 xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
New Commits:
Dave Chinner (7):
[ea0b6eb] xfs: test scratch device mkfs features
[b9b5d74] xfs: New _require_* tests for CRC enabled filesystems
[86e91cc] xfs: add fsstress/recovery test
[5b524ee] xfs/073, 208: remove .full output before starting the test
[b04b0fd] xfs: support xfs_metadump with external logs
[3ed573e] xfs/104: use fixed log size
[7657a10] generic/204: use fixed log size for XFS
David Sterba (3):
[80622a6] xfstests: don't suggest to run full diff when DIFF_LENGTH is 0
[586a06c] xfstests: use value of FSTYP if defined externally
[1ed9046] xfstests: clean command names in btrfs tests
Eric Sandeen (1):
[a93b1dd] ext4: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files
Filipe David Borba Manana (1):
[8c427eb] xfstests: add test for btrfs incremental send infinite loop issue
Koen De Wit (2):
[0c58766] xfstests: btrfs: cross-subvolume sparse copy
[197f773] xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
Code Diffstat:
README | 3 ++
check | 13 ++---
common/attr | 6 +++
common/rc | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/004 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/007 | 4 +-
tests/btrfs/008 | 12 ++---
tests/btrfs/009 | 6 +--
tests/btrfs/013 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/014 | 6 +--
tests/btrfs/015 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/016 | 14 ++---
tests/btrfs/017 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/019 | 14 ++---
tests/btrfs/022 | 6 +--
tests/btrfs/024 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/025 | 4 +-
tests/btrfs/026 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/027 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/028 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/029 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/030 | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/030.out | 1 +
tests/btrfs/031 | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/031.out | 48 +++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/group | 2 +
tests/ext4/306 | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/ext4/306.out | 13 +++++
tests/ext4/group | 1 +
tests/generic/204 | 4 ++
tests/generic/208 | 2 +
tests/shared/298 | 2 +-
tests/xfs/073 | 2 +
tests/xfs/104 | 2 +-
tests/xfs/186 | 1 +
tests/xfs/187 | 32 ++++++-----
tests/xfs/244 | 1 +
tests/xfs/253 | 3 +-
tests/xfs/278 | 1 +
tests/xfs/287 | 3 +-
tests/xfs/291 | 4 +-
tests/xfs/306 | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/xfs/306.out | 2 +
tests/xfs/group | 1 +
45 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
2014-01-24 2:58 [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 Dave Chinner
@ 2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas
2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Lyakas @ 2014-01-29 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs
Hi Dave,
are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle
supposed to pass on XFS?
I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13
(srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get:
root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check tests/generic/013
FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR
generic/013 34s
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see
/mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full)
Ran: generic/013
Passed all 1 tests
root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# echo $?
1
Thanks,
Alex.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The xfstests repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests has
> just been updated. Patches often get missed, so please check if your
> outstanding patches were in this update. If they have not been in
> this update, please resubmit them to xfs@oss.sgi.com so they can be
> picked up in the next update.
>
> The new head of the master branch is commit:
>
> 197f773 xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
>
> New Commits:
>
> Dave Chinner (7):
> [ea0b6eb] xfs: test scratch device mkfs features
> [b9b5d74] xfs: New _require_* tests for CRC enabled filesystems
> [86e91cc] xfs: add fsstress/recovery test
> [5b524ee] xfs/073, 208: remove .full output before starting the test
> [b04b0fd] xfs: support xfs_metadump with external logs
> [3ed573e] xfs/104: use fixed log size
> [7657a10] generic/204: use fixed log size for XFS
>
> David Sterba (3):
> [80622a6] xfstests: don't suggest to run full diff when DIFF_LENGTH is 0
> [586a06c] xfstests: use value of FSTYP if defined externally
> [1ed9046] xfstests: clean command names in btrfs tests
>
> Eric Sandeen (1):
> [a93b1dd] ext4: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files
>
> Filipe David Borba Manana (1):
> [8c427eb] xfstests: add test for btrfs incremental send infinite loop issue
>
> Koen De Wit (2):
> [0c58766] xfstests: btrfs: cross-subvolume sparse copy
> [197f773] xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
>
>
> Code Diffstat:
>
> README | 3 ++
> check | 13 ++---
> common/attr | 6 +++
> common/rc | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +-
> tests/btrfs/004 | 2 +-
> tests/btrfs/007 | 4 +-
> tests/btrfs/008 | 12 ++---
> tests/btrfs/009 | 6 +--
> tests/btrfs/013 | 2 +-
> tests/btrfs/014 | 6 +--
> tests/btrfs/015 | 2 +-
> tests/btrfs/016 | 14 ++---
> tests/btrfs/017 | 2 +-
> tests/btrfs/019 | 14 ++---
> tests/btrfs/022 | 6 +--
> tests/btrfs/024 | 2 +-
> tests/btrfs/025 | 4 +-
> tests/btrfs/026 | 1 +
> tests/btrfs/027 | 1 +
> tests/btrfs/028 | 1 +
> tests/btrfs/029 | 1 +
> tests/btrfs/030 | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/btrfs/030.out | 1 +
> tests/btrfs/031 | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/btrfs/031.out | 48 +++++++++++++++++
> tests/btrfs/group | 2 +
> tests/ext4/306 | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/ext4/306.out | 13 +++++
> tests/ext4/group | 1 +
> tests/generic/204 | 4 ++
> tests/generic/208 | 2 +
> tests/shared/298 | 2 +-
> tests/xfs/073 | 2 +
> tests/xfs/104 | 2 +-
> tests/xfs/186 | 1 +
> tests/xfs/187 | 32 ++++++-----
> tests/xfs/244 | 1 +
> tests/xfs/253 | 3 +-
> tests/xfs/278 | 1 +
> tests/xfs/287 | 3 +-
> tests/xfs/291 | 4 +-
> tests/xfs/306 | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/306.out | 2 +
> tests/xfs/group | 1 +
> 45 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas
@ 2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-01-29 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Lyakas, Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs
On 1/29/14, 1:55 PM, Alex Lyakas wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle
> supposed to pass on XFS?
> I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13
> (srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get:
>
> root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check tests/generic/013
> FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR
>
> generic/013 34s
> _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see
> /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full)
uh, so it failed
> Ran: generic/013
> Passed all 1 tests
but it passed? ;)
The fact that you saw:
> generic/013 34s
and not:
> generic/013 34s ... 33s
or
> generic/013 34s ... output mismatch
or similar, makes me think the test did not even start, and /dev/vda was
corrupted before you even started the test, but I'm not certain.
/mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full has more info.
Anyway, 013 generally passes AFAIK.
-Eric
> root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# echo $?
> 1
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The xfstests repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests has
>> just been updated. Patches often get missed, so please check if your
>> outstanding patches were in this update. If they have not been in
>> this update, please resubmit them to xfs@oss.sgi.com so they can be
>> picked up in the next update.
>>
>> The new head of the master branch is commit:
>>
>> 197f773 xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
>>
>> New Commits:
>>
>> Dave Chinner (7):
>> [ea0b6eb] xfs: test scratch device mkfs features
>> [b9b5d74] xfs: New _require_* tests for CRC enabled filesystems
>> [86e91cc] xfs: add fsstress/recovery test
>> [5b524ee] xfs/073, 208: remove .full output before starting the test
>> [b04b0fd] xfs: support xfs_metadump with external logs
>> [3ed573e] xfs/104: use fixed log size
>> [7657a10] generic/204: use fixed log size for XFS
>>
>> David Sterba (3):
>> [80622a6] xfstests: don't suggest to run full diff when DIFF_LENGTH is 0
>> [586a06c] xfstests: use value of FSTYP if defined externally
>> [1ed9046] xfstests: clean command names in btrfs tests
>>
>> Eric Sandeen (1):
>> [a93b1dd] ext4: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files
>>
>> Filipe David Borba Manana (1):
>> [8c427eb] xfstests: add test for btrfs incremental send infinite loop issue
>>
>> Koen De Wit (2):
>> [0c58766] xfstests: btrfs: cross-subvolume sparse copy
>> [197f773] xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
>>
>>
>> Code Diffstat:
>>
>> README | 3 ++
>> check | 13 ++---
>> common/attr | 6 +++
>> common/rc | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/004 | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/007 | 4 +-
>> tests/btrfs/008 | 12 ++---
>> tests/btrfs/009 | 6 +--
>> tests/btrfs/013 | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/014 | 6 +--
>> tests/btrfs/015 | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/016 | 14 ++---
>> tests/btrfs/017 | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/019 | 14 ++---
>> tests/btrfs/022 | 6 +--
>> tests/btrfs/024 | 2 +-
>> tests/btrfs/025 | 4 +-
>> tests/btrfs/026 | 1 +
>> tests/btrfs/027 | 1 +
>> tests/btrfs/028 | 1 +
>> tests/btrfs/029 | 1 +
>> tests/btrfs/030 | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/btrfs/030.out | 1 +
>> tests/btrfs/031 | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/btrfs/031.out | 48 +++++++++++++++++
>> tests/btrfs/group | 2 +
>> tests/ext4/306 | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/ext4/306.out | 13 +++++
>> tests/ext4/group | 1 +
>> tests/generic/204 | 4 ++
>> tests/generic/208 | 2 +
>> tests/shared/298 | 2 +-
>> tests/xfs/073 | 2 +
>> tests/xfs/104 | 2 +-
>> tests/xfs/186 | 1 +
>> tests/xfs/187 | 32 ++++++-----
>> tests/xfs/244 | 1 +
>> tests/xfs/253 | 3 +-
>> tests/xfs/278 | 1 +
>> tests/xfs/287 | 3 +-
>> tests/xfs/291 | 4 +-
>> tests/xfs/306 | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/xfs/306.out | 2 +
>> tests/xfs/group | 1 +
>> 45 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> Dave Chinner
>> david@fromorbit.com
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-02-02 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Alex Lyakas, xfs
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:04:08PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/29/14, 1:55 PM, Alex Lyakas wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle
> > supposed to pass on XFS?
> > I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13
> > (srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get:
> >
> > root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check tests/generic/013
> > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
> > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic
> > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb
> > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR
> >
> > generic/013 34s
> > _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see
> > /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full)
>
> uh, so it failed
>
> > Ran: generic/013
> > Passed all 1 tests
>
> but it passed? ;)
It passed the test, but failed the post test filesystem checks.
> The fact that you saw:
>
> > generic/013 34s
>
> and not:
>
> > generic/013 34s ... 33s
> or
> > generic/013 34s ... output mismatch
>
> or similar, makes me think the test did not even start, and /dev/vda was
> corrupted before you even started the test, but I'm not certain.
No, what that means is that there was no results/check.time file
that had previous runtime information in it. i.e. this is the first
time the test was run, or that it has always failed like this in the
past on this machine.
As it is:
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas
2014-02-04 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Lyakas @ 2014-02-04 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
Hi Eric and Dave,
Thank you for your comments.
I don't know whether my information is of any value to you or anybody else,
because I am using an EOL kernel 3.8.13.
I have run xfstests several times on two different kinds of block devices.
One is a local file attached to a KVM instance through virtio, second is a
custom Device Mapper. My local.config file is:
export TEST_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x5
export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x6
export TEST_DIR=/mnt/TEST_DIR
export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/SCRATCH_DIR
export FSTYP="xfs"
A good amount of tests did not run, because, e.g., I do not have dump device
etc. I list below the tests that failed for me consistently. I analyzed to a
very limited extent these failures. At some point I decided to focus on
making the tests that pass on a pristine XFS from my kernel, pass on XFS
with my changes.
xfstests/xfsprogs/xfsdumps were built from latest git. fio was build on a
"golden" commit aeb32dfccbd05.
tests/generic:
generic/091 - dowrite: write: Invalid argument
generic/204 - echo: write error: No space left on device
generic/240 - silence is golden, but then: AIO write offset 512 expected
4096 got -22 ...
generic/263 - ???
generic/299 - fio crash
generic/300 - fio crash
generic/314 - need XFS fix for that, which is not in kernel 3.8.13
tests/xfs:
xfs/016 - log size 853 blocks too small, minimum size is 1605 blocks
xfs/018 - ???
xfs/033 - Corrupting root inode - setting bits to 0, xfsrepair:
xfs_imap_to_bp: xfs_trans_read_buf() returned error 117.
xfs/041 - for some reason, in my case the log occupies much more blocks, and
the 32-mb FS has no free space, so fill2fs fails
xfs/073 - after copying, the target device has dirty log..
xfs/081 - logprint with quotas
xfs/082 - v2 stripe logs with logprint
xfs/096 - mkfs.xfs: Specified data stripe width 520 is not the same as the
volume stripe width 1024
xfs/104 - log size 1280 blocks too small, minimum size is 1605 blocks
xfs/109 - fails with ENOSPC
xfs/111 - Overwrote IN @offset 16384
xfs/119 - log size 1200 blocks too small, minimum size is 1968 blocks
xfs/122 - sizes/offsets of some structs/fields differ
xfs/136 - difference in internal structure's content
xfs/171 - failed, 4 streams with matching AGs
xfs/172 - expected failure, matching AGs
xfs/199 - different feature flags, like 0x8a instead of 0xa
xfs/201 - pwrite64: Invalid argument
xfs/206 - existing superblock read failed: Invalid argument
xfs/216 - number of blocks for FS's up to 64g is 12800 (constant); fssize=1g
existing superblock read failed: Invalid argument
xfs/250 - xfs_repair: read failed: Invalid argument, _check_xfs_filesystem:
filesystem on /mnt/TEST_DIR/250.fs is inconsistent (r) (see
/mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//xfs/250.full)
xfs/262 - hard limit 0 bytes, expected 524288000
xfs/279 - mkfs failures and ERROR: Module scsi_debug is in use
xfs/291 - *** glibc detected *** xfs_repair: double free or corruption
(!prev): 0x00007fbd3c0008c0 ***
xfs/292 - output differs only in spaces
xfs/296 - output is identical, except missing: missing:
RESTORE_DIR/DUMP_SUBDIR/testfile cap_setgid,cap_setuid+ep
xfs/297 - output is identical, at the end: _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem
on /dev/vdb is inconsistent (c) (see
/mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//xfs/297.full)
xfs/298 - single difference: core.nextents = 1 vs 0
xfs/306 doesn't fail, but sometimes triggers a memleak in xfs_trans
Thanks,
Alex.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Chinner
Sent: 03 February, 2014 12:35 AM
To: Eric Sandeen
Cc: Alex Lyakas ; xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:04:08PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/29/14, 1:55 PM, Alex Lyakas wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle
> > supposed to pass on XFS?
> > I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13
> > (srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get:
> >
> > root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check
> > tests/generic/013
> > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
> > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic
> > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb
> > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR
> >
> > generic/013 34s
> > _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see
> > /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full)
>
> uh, so it failed
>
> > Ran: generic/013
> > Passed all 1 tests
>
> but it passed? ;)
It passed the test, but failed the post test filesystem checks.
> The fact that you saw:
>
> > generic/013 34s
>
> and not:
>
> > generic/013 34s ... 33s
> or
> > generic/013 34s ... output mismatch
>
> or similar, makes me think the test did not even start, and /dev/vda was
> corrupted before you even started the test, but I'm not certain.
No, what that means is that there was no results/check.time file
that had previous runtime information in it. i.e. this is the first
time the test was run, or that it has always failed like this in the
past on this machine.
As it is:
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas
@ 2014-02-04 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-02-04 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Lyakas; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:53:04PM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote:
> Hi Eric and Dave,
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> I don't know whether my information is of any value to you or
> anybody else, because I am using an EOL kernel 3.8.13.
> I have run xfstests several times on two different kinds of block
> devices. One is a local file attached to a KVM instance through
> virtio, second is a custom Device Mapper. My local.config file is:
> export TEST_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x5
> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x6
> export TEST_DIR=/mnt/TEST_DIR
> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/SCRATCH_DIR
> export FSTYP="xfs"
I'm not going to go into every test failure, but it
definitely sounds like you are running on a RAID device that
exposes sunit/swidth to mkfs. That is the likely cause of all the
log size and stripe unit related failure. Also, you are running
deprecated tests and some that are known to fail. You should run the
"auto" group tests as those are the known "good" tests that should
be regularly run. i.e. Try running:
# MKFS_OPTIONS="-d noalign" ./check -g auto
and that should solve amny of the log size and enospc failures that
you are seeing. What is left is likely to be things we really
need to fix.
FYI, we know there are things that need to be fixed - I currently
see 13 tests from the auto group fail on CRC enabled filesystems:
Failures: generic/263 generic/313 xfs/021 xfs/033 xfs/066 xfs/073
xfs/189 xfs/216 xfs/295 xfs/296 xfs/299 xfs/301 xfs/302
Failed 13 of 240 tests
Several of these are test issues, some of them are bugs that need
triage and fixing. We're slowly working our way through them fixing
the test issues - we've been fixing 3-4 a week for the past few
weeks, so the situation is getting much better - 3 weeks ago the
same test machine was seeing ~25 failures in a run.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-04 22:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-24 2:58 [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 Dave Chinner
2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas
2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas
2014-02-04 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).