From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021F57F3F for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:18:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E195AC00B for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.153.30]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Xx7sm0CagRW3sCAi for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:18:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F925EA.20600@fb.com> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:18:02 -0500 From: Josef Bacik MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/004: fix to make test really work References: <1392034256-2412-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1392034256-2412-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wang Shilong , xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Wang Shilong On 02/10/2014 07:10 AM, Wang Shilong wrote: > From: Wang Shilong > > So i was wandering why test 004 could pass my previous wrong > kernel patch while it defenitely should not. > > By some debugging, i found here perl script is wrong, we did not > filter out anything and this unit test did not work acutally.so > it came out we will never fail this test. > So now with this patch I'm failing it, is there some btrfs patch I need to make it not fail or is it still not supposed to fail normally and is this patch broken? Thanks, Josef _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs