From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE0D7F3F for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:30:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042A88F8037 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.153.30]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ioGBHgTUFRN5DZbe for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:30:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F944F9.7080500@fb.com> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:30:33 -0500 From: Josef Bacik MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfstests/btrfs: add a regression test for running snapshot and send concurrently References: <1391781656-9469-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1391781656-9469-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wang Shilong , xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 02/07/2014 09:00 AM, Wang Shilong wrote: > From: Wang Shilong > > Btrfs would fail to send if snapshot run concurrently, this test is to make > sure we have fixed the bug. > > Looks reasonable, ran it with and without the patch and it did as expected. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Thanks, Josef _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs