From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D73D7F3F for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:25:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9528F8035 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:25:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.145.42]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Wn9fSlQX9DKpDtxJ for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:25:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FA24CB.3070103@fb.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:25:31 -0500 From: Josef Bacik MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: btrfs/004: fix to make test really work References: <1392113204-29237-1-git-send-email-wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1392113204-29237-1-git-send-email-wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wang Shilong , xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 02/11/2014 05:06 AM, Wang Shilong wrote: > So i was wondering why test 004 could pass my previous wrong > kernel patch while it defenitely should not. > > By some debugging, i found here perl script is wrong, we did not > filter out anything and this unit test did not work acutally.so > it came out we will never fail this test. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong > --- This works for me, you can add Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Thanks, Josef _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs