From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFFE7F50 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:24:15 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <52FAB11E.2090803@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:24:14 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: xfs_sb_read_verify() doesn't flag bad crcs on primary sb References: <52FAA85F.1060708@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52FAA85F.1060708@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On 02/11/14 16:46, Eric Sandeen wrote: > My earlier commit 10e6e65 deserves a layer or two of brown paper > bags. The logic in that commit means that a CRC failure on the > primary superblock will *never* result in an error return. > > Hopefully this fixes it, so that we always return the error > if it's a primary superblock, otherwise only if the filesystem > has CRCs enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > --- Augh, blame the reviewer who is always sdrawkcab:) Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs