From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error()
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:56:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FD93F3.4010506@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F9957A.4050301@sandeen.net>
On 2/10/14, 9:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> We want to distinguish between corruption and CRC errors.
> In addition, the full stack trace on verifier errors
> seems less than helpful; it looks more like an oops than
> corruption.
>
> Create a new function to specifically alert the user to
> verifier errors, which can differentiate between
> EFSCORRUPTED and CRC mismatches. It doesn't dump stack
> unless the xfs error level is turned up high.
>
> Define a new error message (EFSBADCRC) to clearly identify
> CRC errors. (Defined to EILSEQ, bad byte sequence)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
...
> +void
> +xfs_verifier_error(
> + struct xfs_buf *bp)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> +
> + xfs_alert(mp,
> +"Metadata %s detected at %pF, block 0x%llx. Unmount and run xfs_repair",
> + bp->b_error == EFSBADCRC ? "CRC error" : "corruption",
> + __builtin_return_address(0), bp->b_bn);
> +
> + if (xfs_error_level >= XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW)
> + xfs_hex_dump(bp->b_addr, 64);
This needs to handle the case where we have a page array rather than a b_addr, as well.
(The existing calls to XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR would have oopsed on this too)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-11 3:08 [PATCH 0/7 V2] xfs: verifier modification series Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 3:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: limit superblock corruption errors to actual corruption Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 3:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: skip pointless CRC updates after verifier failures Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 3:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: Use defines for CRC offsets in all cases Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 3:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: add helper for verifying checksums on xfs_bufs Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 3:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: add helper for updating " Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error() Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 19:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-11 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-14 3:56 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-02-11 3:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: modify verifiers to differentiate CRC failures from other errors Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FD93F3.4010506@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox