From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0559D8001 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:59:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8092BAC001 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7I0x2uBQVMA0PuWN for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:59:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5303D7DD.6030205@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:59:57 -0600 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: list spam References: <530386A3.1000604@hardwarefreak.com> <53039793.4040809@sgi.com> <20140218212232.GG13647@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20140218212232.GG13647@dastard> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner , Keith Keller Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 2/18/2014 3:22 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: ... > I don't know if anyone has noticed, but a large amount of the spam > is directed at the deprecated linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com list aliases. > Kill that alias, and a large amount of the spam disappears. 53/173, non-scientific, in my folders, so roughly 1/3rd of spam getting through the nets is addressed to the deprecated address. I agree, kill that alias. > FWIW, from the perspective of someone who has a lot of lists > directing email at him, the XFS list is no worse than most others. Maybe my vision is skewed. The only other open list I sub is linux-raid@vger.kernel.org. It has a little less average volume than xfs, but only like one spam every few days gets through. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs