From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: Use defines for CRC offsets in all cases
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:41:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5305CDAE.50004@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140220002713.GI4916@dastard>
On 02/20 2014 08:27 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:56:54PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I read the previous comments from Dave about using defines for CRC offsets,
>> and with a grep search after applying this patch, looks there have another
>> two places maybe we should switch them to the macros as well:
>>
>> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c:
>> Do we need a log record crc offset macros for offsetof(struct xlog_rec_header, h_crc))?
>>
>> xfs_dinode.h:
>> we added the XFS_DINODE_CRC_OFF, just use it at below routine?
>>
>> static inline uint xfs_dinode_size(int version)
>> {
>> if (version == 3)
>> return sizeof(struct xfs_dinode);
>> return offsetof(struct xfs_dinode, di_crc);
>> }
>
> No, that's a different case - it's not being used for determining
> the offset of a CRC varaible - it's being used to calculate the size
> of the version 2 inode core. Hence it should remain open coded like
> because it has a different purpose in life....
Thanks for the clarification, so we don't need that for the second inode
case, but the first case is used to determine the log record crc offset
to generate the crc for record header, shouldn't we make it consistent
with others?
Thanks,
-Jeff
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-18 23:52 [PATCH 0/9] current series for verifier error differentiation Eric Sandeen
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: skip verification on initial "guess" superblock read Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 3:36 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: limit superblock corruption errors to actual corruption Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 3:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: skip pointless CRC updates after verifier failures Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 6:35 ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: Use defines for CRC offsets in all cases Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 7:56 ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-20 0:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 9:33 ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-20 9:41 ` Jeff Liu [this message]
2014-02-27 2:15 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: add helper for verifying checksums on xfs_bufs Eric Sandeen
2014-02-27 4:17 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: add helper for updating " Eric Sandeen
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error() Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 6:30 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 2:58 ` [PATCH 7/9 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2014-02-27 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: print useful caller information in xfs_error_report Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 12:42 ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: modify verifiers to differentiate CRC from other errors Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 14:01 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-19 16:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-20 3:10 ` [PATCH 9/9 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2014-02-20 13:10 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-27 9:12 ` [PATCH 0/9] current series for verifier error differentiation Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5305CDAE.50004@oracle.com \
--to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox