From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: clean up xfs_set_maxicount & use in growfs
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:29:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530E3282.7000703@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140226021114.GA26022@infradead.org>
On 2/25/14, 8:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:27:35PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> xfs_set_maxicount() overflowed fairly easily for large filesystems
>> and large maxicount; we started out by multiplying dblocks by
>> the percentage, *then* dividing by 100, and never checked for
>> an overflow. The calculations were also, IMHO, a little hard
>> to follow.
>
> Would be useful to get this test case into xfstests..
Ok so I was going on Dave's assertion about that. ;)
To overflow, we'd need dblocks * 100 to be > 2^64-1:
so dblocks would need to be > (2^64-1)/100
for 4k blocks that's 655 exabytes. Maybe not so possible after all ;)
Dave, maybe just removing the open-code is enough here.
-Eric
>> -STATIC void
>> +void
>> xfs_set_maxicount(xfs_mount_t *mp)
>> {
>> xfs_sb_t *sbp = &(mp->m_sb);
>> - __uint64_t icount;
>> + __uint64_t iblocks;
>
> Seems like this could move into the if clause below.
>
>> @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ extern int xfs_mod_incore_sb_batch(xfs_mount_t *, xfs_mod_sb_t *,
>> extern int xfs_mount_log_sb(xfs_mount_t *, __int64_t);
>> extern struct xfs_buf *xfs_getsb(xfs_mount_t *, int);
>> extern int xfs_readsb(xfs_mount_t *, int);
>> +void xfs_set_maxicount(xfs_mount_t *mp);
>> extern void xfs_freesb(xfs_mount_t *);
>> extern int xfs_fs_writable(xfs_mount_t *);
>> extern int xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(struct xfs_sb *, __uint64_t);
>
> A missing extern while all other prototypes around it have one seems
> rather odd.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-25 5:27 [PATCH] xfs: clean up xfs_set_maxicount & use in growfs Eric Sandeen
2014-02-26 2:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-26 2:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-26 18:29 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-02-27 7:11 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-27 14:08 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530E3282.7000703@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox