From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C155F29DF7 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:07:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C42E304043 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8dgkBKEcDndui6nu for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:06:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <530F548C.9060302@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:06:52 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS on Fedora i686, armv7hl References: <8A28EF88-012E-4036-BDB6-E76B1CC569A7@colorremedies.com> In-Reply-To: <8A28EF88-012E-4036-BDB6-E76B1CC569A7@colorremedies.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Chris Murphy , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On 2/26/14, 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > Fedora is considering XFS as their default file system. They support > three primary architectures: x86_64, i686, and armv7hl. Do XFS devs > have any reservations about XFS as a default file system on either > i686, or arm? As Dave said, we rely on others to do ARM testing for the most part, though I've certainly jumped in and debugged some issues from time to time. It'd be super if Fedora could run the xfstests test suite on arm as part of QE. I'd be more than happy to help get that started if people are interested. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs