From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CA029DF7 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:15:00 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53344075.8050607@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:15:01 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs errors while unlinking filenames with hash collisions References: <20140327074156.GJ29498@order.stressinduktion.org> <5334241E.9060708@sgi.com> <20140327132354.GU29498@order.stressinduktion.org> <533428D6.507@sgi.com> <20140327140556.GW29498@order.stressinduktion.org> In-Reply-To: <20140327140556.GW29498@order.stressinduktion.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 03/27/14 09:05, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:34:14AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> On 03/27/14 08:23, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:14:06AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >>>> Have you tried to run a xfs_repair on the filesystem after the reboot? >>> >>> Yes, I did. I still use the filesystem and it works. As soon as I try to >>> remove the directory again the same splash from above happens again. >> >> Is it the latest xfsprogs' repair? >> >> Do you have the output from the repair still? > > I can easily test this here, so you can throw any commands and tests at > me. ;) > > This is the output: > > (I replayed the journal before that) > > pre-mount:/# xfs_repair -V > xfs_repair version 3.1.11 > pre-mount:/# xfs_repair -v /dev/vda1 > Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... > - block cache size set to 372848 entries > Phase 2 - using internal log > - zero log... > zero_log: head block 5071 tail block 5071 > - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps... > - found root inode chunk > Phase 3 - for each AG... > - scan and clear agi unlinked lists... > - process known inodes and perform inode discovery... > - agno = 0 > bad hash ordering in block 8388739 of directory inode 3543184 interesting. I will see if I can recreate it. Are you open to making it an xfstest? --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs