From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039D17F5D for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:56:57 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <533B0BF5.5000404@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 13:56:53 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH xfstests] tests for file hash collisions on xfs filesystems References: <20140327074156.GJ29498@order.stressinduktion.org> <20140401184903.GA13434@order.stressinduktion.org> In-Reply-To: <20140401184903.GA13434@order.stressinduktion.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 04/01/14 13:49, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > This patch adds a new check for xfstests, which generates directories with 64 > distinct hash values and afterwards tries to delete the directory. This caused > a hash ordering issue. > > The file-hash-tool can also generate files (this should result in the same > original problem as with directories) and generate only filenames with one > hash (this can be very well optimized in future). > > This is just a preview. Dave Chiner seems to want this as soon as possible, > thus please review and suggest changes so I can adapt this patch ASAP. > > Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa > --- I had some suggestions for the C and xfstests that cross paths with this post. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs