From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A313B7F67 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:30:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <534F0498.4010902@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:30:48 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix 32bit __divdi3 undefined References: <534EAB41.60901@windriver.com> <20140416215223.512644029@sgi.com> <20140416221000.GO15995@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20140416221000.GO15995@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Paul Gortmaker , XFS Filesystem On 04/16/14 17:10, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:51:56PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> The roundup in commit 68c1fb5d should be a roundup_64() >> because it is desired to round a 64 bit type by an integer >> and that will result in a 64 bit value. On 32 bit machines >> using roundup() in this case will result in the error: >> >> ERROR: "__divdi3" [fs/xfs/xfs.ko] undefined! >> >> Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker >> Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker >> Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely >> --- >> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c >> =================================================================== >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c >> @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ __xfs_get_blocks( >> if (offset< i_size_read(inode)&& >> offset + mapping_size>= i_size_read(inode)) { >> /* limit mapping to block that spans EOF */ >> - mapping_size = roundup(i_size_read(inode) - offset, >> + mapping_size = roundup_64(i_size_read(inode) - offset, >> 1<< inode->i_blkbits); >> } >> if (mapping_size> LONG_MAX) > > I'm not going to apply this as a patch - I'm going to rebase the > branch with the fix in the original patch so we don't have a bisect > breakage in the branch. Don't worry, I'll add the fact you fixed the > bug into the commit message... > > Cheers, > > Dave. Makes sense. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs