From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7FA29DF8 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:22:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <535E8E47.2040701@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:22:15 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: test for shut down fs in xfs_dir_fsync() References: <535E8344.2070209@redhat.com> <20140428164754.GA17472@infradead.org> <535E8D67.3010504@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <535E8D67.3010504@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Boris Ranto , xfs-oss On 04/28/14 12:18, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 4/28/14, 11:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:35:16AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> Similar to xfs_file_fsync(), I think xfs_dir_fsync() needs >>> to test for a shut down fs, >> >> It probably should. >> >>> lest we go down paths we'll >>> never be able to complete; Boris reported that during some >>> stress tests he had threads stuck in xlog_cil_force_lsn >>> via xfs_dir_fsync(). >> >> But this could still happen if we get a shutdown coming in after that >> test. > > True... that looked a bit hairier to sort out. :( > > -Eric > Are the sync lsn look okay? Was there an error writing the iclog buffer? xfs_do_force_shutdown() will also do a xlog_cil_force_lsn() via the xfs_log_force_umount if the log buffer write was not in error. That should be the same or later than this lsn. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs