public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 15:48:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536893DB.7050705@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399348559-19889-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>


On 05/06 2014 11:55 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> We reject any filesystem that is mounted with this feature bit set,
> so we don't need to check for it anywhere else. Remove the function
> for checking if the feature bit is set and any code that uses it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c |  2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_sb.c    |  3 ++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_sb.h    | 17 ++++-------------
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> index b099799..97886a7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> @@ -84,8 +84,6 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
>  				XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_IALIGN : 0) |
>  			(xfs_sb_version_hasdalign(&mp->m_sb) ?
>  				XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_DALIGN : 0) |
> -			(xfs_sb_version_hasshared(&mp->m_sb) ?
> -				XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_SHARED : 0) |

Just a trivial comments, now the XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_SHARED is useless, so
we can remove it from fs/xfs/xfs.h.

Otherwise, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>


Cheers,
-Jeff

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-06  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-06  3:55 [PATCH 0/5] xfs: sanitise supberlock feature bit support Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  3:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: make superblock version checks reflect reality Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  8:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-06  8:39     ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  3:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: keep sb_bad_features2 the same a sb_features2 Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  8:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-06  3:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: turn NLINK feature on by default Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  8:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-06  9:06     ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  3:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: don't need dirv2 checks anymore Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  8:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-06  8:45     ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  3:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  7:48   ` Jeff Liu [this message]
2014-05-06  8:02     ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-06  8:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-06  8:28     ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-16 23:00 [PATCH 0/5 V2] xfs: sanitise superblock feature bit support Dave Chinner
2014-05-16 23:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536893DB.7050705@oracle.com \
    --to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox