* Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0?
@ 2014-05-08 18:40 Eric Sandeen
2014-05-08 20:39 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-05-08 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-oss
I think we had stated removal in June 2014, but it seems close enough.
Should xfs_check be removed prior to 3.2.0's release?
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0?
2014-05-08 18:40 Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0? Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-05-08 20:39 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-08 20:40 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-05-08 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:40:21PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I think we had stated removal in June 2014, but it seems close enough.
>
> Should xfs_check be removed prior to 3.2.0's release?
I'd prefer to do it slightly later than earlier.
As it is, 3.2.0 is really in the "critical fixes only" stage - like
that repair prefetch bug. So apart from fixes like that, I don't
want to be changing things right now.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0?
2014-05-08 20:39 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2014-05-08 20:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-05-08 21:04 ` Emmanuel Florac
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-05-08 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs-oss
On 5/8/14, 3:39 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:40:21PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> I think we had stated removal in June 2014, but it seems close enough.
>>
>> Should xfs_check be removed prior to 3.2.0's release?
>
> I'd prefer to do it slightly later than earlier.
>
> As it is, 3.2.0 is really in the "critical fixes only" stage - like
> that repair prefetch bug. So apart from fixes like that, I don't
> want to be changing things right now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
*shrug* ok. Let a thousand "hey my xfs_check OOM'd" emails blossom! :)
FWIW, I did not have time to work on that prefetch bug yet today. :(
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0?
2014-05-08 20:40 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-05-08 21:04 ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-05-08 22:02 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Emmanuel Florac @ 2014-05-08 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
Le Thu, 08 May 2014 15:40:57 -0500 vous écriviez:
> *shrug* ok. Let a thousand "hey my xfs_check OOM'd" emails
> blossom! :)
>
> FWIW, I did not have time to work on that prefetch bug yet today. :(
>
Why not replace it by a script that simply states that it's useless and
to run xfs_repair -n instead? It has been completely useless for the
best part of the past ten years... This way you don't remove it but
you'll sort of fix it :)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@intellique.com>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0?
2014-05-08 21:04 ` Emmanuel Florac
@ 2014-05-08 22:02 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-05-08 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emmanuel Florac; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs-oss
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:04:10PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Thu, 08 May 2014 15:40:57 -0500 vous écriviez:
>
> > *shrug* ok. Let a thousand "hey my xfs_check OOM'd" emails
> > blossom! :)
> >
> > FWIW, I did not have time to work on that prefetch bug yet today. :(
> >
>
> Why not replace it by a script that simply states that it's useless and
> to run xfs_repair -n instead? It has been completely useless for the
> best part of the past ten years... This way you don't remove it but
> you'll sort of fix it :)
xfs_check is already just a script that wraps xfs_db.
However, there's all the man page updates, all the external
documentation needs to be updated, etc. IOWs, it's not just a case
of a simply patching out the xfs_check script....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-08 22:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-08 18:40 Remove xfs_check for 3.2.0? Eric Sandeen
2014-05-08 20:39 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-08 20:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-05-08 21:04 ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-05-08 22:02 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox