From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E51D7F3F for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 09:52:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02239AC00B for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 07:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id aXeccDcihpBpwMDW for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 07:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53738316.20601@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:52:06 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: =?windows-1252?Q?Luk=E1=9A_Czerner?= , dchinner@redhat.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 5/14/14, 8:20 AM, Luk=E1=9A Czerner wrote: > Hi Dave, > = > I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate > mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and > even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks > are definitely interested in the development process, but not > everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the > xfs@oss.sgi.com list. > = > To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests > patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder > unfortunately. > = > linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I > think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. > = > What do you think ? That sounds pretty reasonable to me. We've always encouraged submissions to cc: the other relevant lists (i.e. linux-ext4 if it's an ext4-specific patch) and would probably still encourage that, but even from the other angle (keeping i.e. ext4-specific and btrfs-specific patches off the xfs list) this sounds like a good idea. -Eric > Thanks! > -Lukas _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs