From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745BC7F3F for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 10:01:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9E28F8035 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 08:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.153.30]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gCgKeQCCdIV7BwDT for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 08:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53738597.70305@fb.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:02:47 -0400 From: Chris Mason MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests References: <53738316.20601@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53738316.20601@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen , =?windows-1252?Q?Luk=E1=9A_Czern?= =?windows-1252?Q?er?= , dchinner@redhat.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 05/14/2014 10:52 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/14/14, 8:20 AM, Luk=E1=9A Czerner wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate >> mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and >> even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks >> are definitely interested in the development process, but not >> everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the >> xfs@oss.sgi.com list. >> >> To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests >> patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder >> unfortunately. >> >> linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I >> think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. >> >> What do you think ? > = > That sounds pretty reasonable to me. We've always encouraged submissions > to cc: the other relevant lists (i.e. linux-ext4 if it's an ext4-specific > patch) and would probably still encourage that, but even from the other > angle (keeping i.e. ext4-specific and btrfs-specific patches off the > xfs list) this sounds like a good idea. +1 here. -chris _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs