From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D83B7F54 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:35:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F263AC007 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9sBsRYtO1oyygCS6 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <538CFB83.20703@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:32:35 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC 11/32] xfs: convert to struct inode_time References: <1401480116-1973111-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <8618458.1EVJCoVbkH@wuerfel> <4178301.j9kWdGCRLC@wuerfel> <6868F108-F0B2-423F-AE31-90DF86A5B7DD@oracle.com> <20140602153124.GH30598@thunk.org> <538CB085.5000502@zytor.com> <20140602222954.GA29690@thunk.org> In-Reply-To: <20140602222954.GA29690@thunk.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Theodore Ts'o , Chuck Lever , Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Dave Chinner , LKML Kernel , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, Christoph Hellwig , tglx@linutronix.de, geert@linux-m68k.org, lftan@altera.com, linux-fsdevel , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux NFS Mailing List On 06/02/2014 03:29 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > And since we are already returning (time_t) -1 in some cases, we might > as well try to make things a bit more formal. > Are we? I am not aware of *Linux* actually using that. -hpa _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs