From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_mdrestore: initialize sb prior to xfs_sb_from_disk()
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:58:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53961FE7.3050607@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53912D1F.6010609@sandeen.net>
On 6/5/14, 9:53 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 6/5/14, 8:42 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:00:02PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 6/5/14, 6:56 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:09:16PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> But ... should we maybe just do this once and for all in
>>>>> xfs_sb_from_disk? I'm not sure leaving it up to every
>>>>> caller is a good idea, unless somebody ahs a reason to
>>>>> pre-populate some fields - I can't imagine why that would
>>>>> be, though...
>>>>
>>>> We don't ever read in the CRC field into the in-memory structures
>>>> because it has no meaning in memory. Simiarly, we don't ever write
>>>> the CRC field from the in-core structure because we always
>>>> re-calculate it in the IO path if CRCs are configured. That is
>>>> consistent behaviour across the entire code-base.
But as you say in userspace, this
libxfs_sb_to_disk(buf, sbp, XFS_SB_ALL_BITS)
*does* write it.
kernelspace does the same here:
0 xfs_fsops.c xfs_growfs_data_private 520 xfs_sb_to_disk(XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), &mp->m_sb, XFS_SB_ALL_BITS);
>>> <snip stuff>
>>>
>>>> Perhaps we should move the memset() to within xfs_sb_from_disk()
>>>> to make this explicit?
>>>
>>> Yes, that's what I meant by "this" in "do this once and for all" -
>>> sorry, that wasn't clear. memset(0) in xfs_sb_from_disk().
>>
>> I didn't read it clearly. my fault.
>>
>>> Yeah, the more I think about it, the more I think that's probably
>>> the obviously correct thing to do.
>
> Actually, a memset() seems like overkill - every field except
> sb_crc is explicitly filled in in the function.
>
> Maybe better to just set sb_crc to 0, with a comment as to why?
> I think I'll whip that one up.
But now I realize we do sometimes write the in-memory value to
disk, as seen above.
Backing up - shouldn't we just go ahead and read/write it from/to
disk just like every other field, at least in the cases where we
are writing all, and when we are reading (which always reads all)?
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 23:09 [PATCH] xfs_mdrestore: initialize sb prior to xfs_sb_from_disk() Eric Sandeen
2014-06-05 23:56 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-06 0:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-06-06 1:42 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-06 2:53 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-06-09 20:58 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-06-09 21:30 ` [PATCH V2] xfs: fix crc field handling in xfs_sb_to/from_disk Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53961FE7.3050607@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox