From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CBD7F69 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:46:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB03AC003 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JsJKNKPCtM5dHzD7 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:46:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54028C7F.4040706@sandeen.net> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:46:23 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Run out of inodes? References: <54005108.1020203@inserm.fr> <20140829114806.GA17610@bfoster.bfoster> <5400802C.5050005@inserm.fr> <54009603.9050404@sandeen.net> <8d5fff2548d35737c6cebcb1f6382e80@inserm.fr> In-Reply-To: <8d5fff2548d35737c6cebcb1f6382e80@inserm.fr> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Samuel GRANJEAUD IR/INSERM , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 8/30/14, 2:33 PM, Samuel GRANJEAUD IR/INSERM wrote: > Enabling the inode64 option has solved the problem. > > Final question: could some issues appear with SAMBA? ah, what sort of issues? Any application which uses i.e. a 32-bit stat() interface will return -EOVERFLOW on a 64-bit inode. http://sandeen.net/wordpress/computers/the-world-wants-32-bit-inodes/ http://blog.fmeh.org/2013/05/11/does-the-world-need-32-bit-inodes/ -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs