From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from talk.nabble.com (www.nabble.com [72.21.53.35]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k6K4O3DW018069 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:24:04 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1G3Q4c-0003Il-2P for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:23:42 -0700 Message-ID: <5408752.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:23:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Cosmo Nova Subject: Re: file system defragmentation In-Reply-To: <20050828034108.73921.qmail@web34103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4f52331f050826001612f8e323@mail.gmail.com> <20050826101131.GA24544@ii.uib.no> <4f52331f0508260848782f240a@mail.gmail.com> <43112C5D.8090202@sgi.com> <20050828034108.73921.qmail@web34103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com what is the maximum tolerance for the delayed allocations pls? I guess it's not possible to buf a GB size file and delay its allocation? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/file-system-defragmentation-tf255485.html#a5408752 Sent from the Xfs - General forum at Nabble.com.