From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A1C7F4E for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 04:49:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBE68F8040 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 02:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ph.de-nserver.de (mail-ph.de-nserver.de [85.158.179.214]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id N7c3WwZzxpPu9DWf (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <540D7BA0.6090107@profihost.ag> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:49:20 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage? References: <540986B1.4080306@profihost.ag> <20140905123058.GA29710@bfoster.bfoster> <5409AF40.10801@profihost.ag> <20140905230528.GO20473@dastard> <540AB933.4030707@profihost.ag> <20140906150412.GB23506@bfoster.bfoster> <20140906225654.GB9955@dastard> <540D6A6C.9090801@profihost.ag> <20140908094659.GC30012@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20140908094659.GC30012@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Brian Foster , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Am 08.09.2014 um 11:46 schrieb Dave Chinner: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:35:56AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> Thanks, >> >> upgraded to 3.16.2 and xfsprogs 3.2.1. Let's see how it behaves with finobt. > > You need to mkfs the filesystem to use finobt - it's not something > that an upgrade will just switch on. i.e. > > # mkfs.xfs -m crc=1,finobt=1 Sure i also did a reformat using "-m crc=1,finobt=1". Stefan > Cheers, > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs