From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768397F3F for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:05:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAA9304048 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atvie01s.evermeet.cx (evermeet.cx [77.244.245.66]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gvDLIWajZ4uNoz7T (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.40] (135-23-85-229.cpe.pppoe.ca [135.23.85.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by atvie01s.evermeet.cx (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8O252Cq008420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:05:04 +0200 Message-ID: <542226CD.6050106@evermeet.cx> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 22:05:01 -0400 From: Helmut Tessarek MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: How to format RAID1 correctly References: <5422146A.90206@evermeet.cx> In-Reply-To: <5422146A.90206@evermeet.cx> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 23.09.14 20:46 , Helmut Tessarek wrote: > So what is ultimately the correct way to format a RAID1? According to sandeen in #xfs the correct way is: mkfs.xfs /dev/md0 Makes sense, since no striping is involved. Just wanted to clarify and I did. Cheers, K. C. -- regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek lookup http://sks.pkqs.net for KeyID 0xC11F128D /* Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness await thee at its end. */ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs