From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8067F3F for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:09:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB94E304032 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id h44o89fdek3uFVET for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <542243E6.1040302@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:09:10 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: How to format RAID1 correctly References: <5422146A.90206@evermeet.cx> <54222763.40107@sandeen.net> <5422285B.6010306@evermeet.cx> <542234F6.4080000@hardwarefreak.com> <5422376D.3000204@evermeet.cx> In-Reply-To: <5422376D.3000204@evermeet.cx> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Helmut Tessarek , Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 09/23/2014 10:15 PM, Helmut Tessarek wrote: > On 23.09.14 23:05 , stan hoeppner wrote: >> It confuses many people who are new to md RAID1. The above is the >> *bitmap* chunk size, not the array chunk size. There is no array chunk >> size for RAID1 as there is no striping. You must have striping to have >> chunks. With md RAID1 every 4KB page write is simply mirrored to each >> physical disk. > > Thanks for the info. I'm used to big ass storage subsystems, but new to SW > RAID. I seems I have some catching up to do. If you create any striped arrays, especially parity arrays, with md make sure to manually specify chunk size and match it to your workload. The current default is 512KB. This is too large for a great many workloads, specifically those that are metadata heavy or manipulate many small files. 512KB wastes space and with parity arrays causes RMW, hammering throughput and increasing latency. Cheers, Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs