From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3107F73 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:46:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92C78F8039 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RswvJ71wrVQK8i9I for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (liberator.sandeen.net [10.0.0.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sandeen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E044561295A6 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:46:34 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <542AC24C.8030907@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:46:36 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services References: <20140930141857.GA2053@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20140930141857.GA2053@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 9/30/14 9:18 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering why > xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use the "usual > public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs mailing list to > vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org? Please see the prior thread on 8/6/14: [DISCUSS] Moving from oss.sgi.com to kernel.org :) > Sorry about been asking it mainly because I'm too lazy to keep deleting spams > from my inbox, and also, because having 'everything I need' in a single place > (kernel.org) would make my life easier (and probably many other lives :). > > Anyway, it's just a question/suggestion, please don't get me wrong here. > IIRC there were some discussion regarding this some time ago, but, I'm not > sure where the discussion stopped and/or if any decision were taken. I think it's still the plan, but takes some time & effort & coordination. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs