From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0567E7F3F for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:56:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89700AC00F for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smithers.houseofnate.net (smithers.houseofnate.net [66.175.213.200]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id KWExNHK4QEQiIZTn (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smithers.houseofnate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194CF2201CA for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:56:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smithers.houseofnate.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smithers.houseofnate.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6lbkVv-QlV1 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:56:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.20.110.49] (unknown [69.84.133.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nturner) by smithers.houseofnate.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A388821F8F1 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:56:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <54341B23.8010708@houseofnate.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:56:03 -0400 From: "Nathaniel W. Turner" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Question about services References: <7e633ff6302413da933e04671cd98cdc@bairesdev.com> <20141006175243.GA4680@hades.localdomain> <54331346.7050005@telefonica.net> <20141007005826.GA30678@hades.localdomain> <5433B1A1.90500@opensuse.org> In-Reply-To: <5433B1A1.90500@opensuse.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 10/07/2014 05:25 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2014-10-07 02:58, Carlos Maiolino wrote: >> Whatever, this got me, well written scam :) > Absolutely :-) > It fooled my spamassassin. > Well, your spam filter was at a disadvantage here because the message came to you via the XFS mailing list, not directly from the spammer. By passing along the spam, the mailing list is adding some legitimacy to the message in the eyes of most spam filters. Speaking of spam, when are we going to move to a mailing list infrastructure that has functional spam filtering (and doesn't repost DSNs)? [grumpy cat image goes here] n _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs