From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC137F4E for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:54:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C387CAC002 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nonGgGBbfyHAewPa for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:54:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54451427.9060306@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:54:47 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Can't build RPM of xfstests References: <648473255763364B961A02AC3BE1060D03C7940C13@MX19A.corp.emc.com> <20141020014750.GL7169@dastard> <54448313.7040602@sandeen.net> <30CA1845-C213-49EA-8809-F1E7A98AE7F9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <30CA1845-C213-49EA-8809-F1E7A98AE7F9@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Greg Freemyer , Dave Chinner , "Kaul, Yaniv" Cc: esandeen@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On 10/20/14 6:55 AM, Greg Freemyer wrote: > Opensuse is building rpms of 1.1.1 so the build infrastructure isn't > too badly broken. I don't know if they are following FHS, but I > doubt they use /opt. The build works fine, it's the "Makepkgs" that I think is a bit odd, at least for RPM packaging. Also, if we really want to encourage packaging, we should probably start sticking official version numbers on it. "1.1.1" was tagged in Dec 2012, and there have been no "releases" since. > The opensuse package/specfile can be found at: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/filesystems/xfstests > > The rpms including the source rpm can be downloaded from: > http://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=filesystems&package=xfstests > > Note the specfile applies a patch to change the install aspect of > the tarball immediately after untar'ing it. > > I don't maintain that so I don't know why the patch is needed. Ok, cool, I'll take a look at the specfile & patch. I had also packaged it up for our internal QA use long ago, and had to make a few changes as well. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs