From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52627F37 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:58:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3344304032 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qGrVrztkmd9Wn6n1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54507402.4000600@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:58:42 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PATCH] xfs/068: fix expected output file for proper restore output List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs-oss Oh my, I did a very bad thing - I wrote a new test to check for xfsdump regressions, but did not create the .out file with a known-good kernel. This matches output from older, stable kernels, and is the proper expected output. Sorry about that! Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen --- diff --git a/tests/xfs/068.out b/tests/xfs/068.out index c270c66..2196eee 100644 --- a/tests/xfs/068.out +++ b/tests/xfs/068.out @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ xfsrestore: session id: ID xfsrestore: media ID: ID xfsrestore: searching media for directory dump xfsrestore: reading directories -xfsrestore: 486 directories and 1590 entries processed +xfsrestore: 495 directories and 1593 entries processed xfsrestore: directory post-processing xfsrestore: restoring non-directory files xfsrestore: restore complete: SECS seconds elapsed _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs