From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A35D7F3F for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:59:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5748F8037 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fLP3brJv2JWaiaIc for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:59:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <545D4EE5.6040901@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:59:49 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: beginners project: RENAME_WHITEOUT References: <20141107190959.GB21021@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20141107190959.GB21021@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: Carlos Maiolino , Miklos Szeredi On 11/7/14 1:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The overlayfs merge introduces a new rename flag to create to whiteouts. > Should be a fairly easy to implement. > > Miklos, do you have any good documentation and/or test cases for this? FWIW, Carlos just expressed some interest today in doing this, and it builds on his earlier patches, yes? -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs