From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5597F3F for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:35:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC608F8049 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:35:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id dxYidOFJiyLuHP4N for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:35:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54622CE8.7050508@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:36:08 -0600 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Enforcing quota for root user References: <67EDE14C-CCFB-4B42-8B78-FC6C813CD19A@free.fr> <5461B333.8050609@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Cyril Scetbon Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/11/2014 04:22 AM, Cyril Scetbon wrote: > That's what I've read first, but someone showed me a sample where it works. He just told me he was using project quota. However, does it make sense ? > I've also read somewhere else that quota is never enforced for root user (id,gid=0) that's why I was testing it .... No, it doesn't make sense. Why would you want to enforce quotas for root? Regards, Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs