From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] repair: fix unnecessary secondary scan if only last sb is corrupt
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:44:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B834CB.2030400@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421179693-17227-2-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On 1/13/15 2:08 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> verify_set_primary_sb() scans the secondary superbocks based on the
> geometry specified in the primary and determines the most likely correct
> geometry by tracking how many superblocks are consistent across the set.
> The most frequent geometry is copied into the primary superblock. The
> return value is checked by the caller (phase1()) to determine whether a
> brute force secondary scan is necessary.
>
> This generally occurs when not enough secondary sb's are consistent to
> declare the geometry correct. If enough secondaries are consistent,
> verify_set_primary_sb() returns the status of the last secondary sb that
> was scanned. Corruptions to secondary supers other than the last are
> thus resolved fine. If the last secondary is corrupt, however, an error
> is returned to phase1(). This causes a brute force scan even if enough
> supers were found to repair the last secondary.
>
> Move the initialization of retval to after the sb scan to return an
> error only if not enough secondary supers were found to declare a
> correct geometry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Nice. Brute-force scan is awful, doing it when unnecessary stinks! :)
could this be fstest-ed?
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> repair/sb.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/repair/sb.c b/repair/sb.c
> index ad27756..dc154f7 100644
> --- a/repair/sb.c
> +++ b/repair/sb.c
> @@ -724,7 +724,6 @@ verify_set_primary_sb(xfs_sb_t *rsb,
> * sector size rather than the sector size in @rsb.
> */
> size = NUM_AGH_SECTS * (1 << (XFS_MAX_SECTORSIZE_LOG));
> - retval = 0;
> list = NULL;
> num_ok = 0;
> *sb_modified = 0;
> @@ -779,6 +778,7 @@ verify_set_primary_sb(xfs_sb_t *rsb,
> /*
> * see if we have enough superblocks to bother with
> */
> + retval = 0;
> if (num_ok < num_sbs / 2) {
> retval = XR_INSUFF_SEC_SB;
> goto out_free_list;
> @@ -868,5 +868,5 @@ out_free_list:
> free_geo(list);
> free(sb);
> free(checked);
> - return(retval);
> + return retval;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 20:08 [PATCH 0/2] xfsprogs/repair: secondary sb scan cleanups Brian Foster
2015-01-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] repair: fix unnecessary secondary scan if only last sb is corrupt Brian Foster
2015-01-15 21:44 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-01-16 12:05 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] repair: remove unused strided secondary sb scan logic Brian Foster
2015-01-15 23:15 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B834CB.2030400@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox