From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097117F5F for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 01:14:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8268F804B for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 23:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id IaFsZ0TdBCRwDpEA (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:14:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by widem10 with SMTP id em10so19293866wid.0 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:14:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54F55F40.6010508@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 08:14:08 +0100 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Documenting MS_LAZYTIME References: <54E7578E.4090809@redhat.com> <20150221025636.GB7922@thunk.org> <54EEDE23.6080009@gmail.com> <20150226133113.GD11217@thunk.org> <54EF2161.90607@gmail.com> <20150227000409.GC17174@thunk.org> <54F02446.2050008@gmail.com> <20150227175159.GC11031@birch.djwong.org> In-Reply-To: <20150227175159.GC11031@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Eric Sandeen , Theodore Ts'o , linux-man@vger.kernel.org, Linux API , XFS Developers , mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Linux-Fsdevel , Ext4 Developers List , Linux btrfs Developers List On 02/27/2015 06:51 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:01:10AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> On 02/27/2015 01:04 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>>> >>>> The disadvantage of MS_STRICTATIME | MS_LAZYTIME is that >>>> in the case of a system crash, the atime and mtime fields >>>> on disk might be out of date by at most 24 hours. >>> >>> I'd change to "The disadvantage of MS_LAZYTIME is that..." and >>> perhaps move that so it's clear it applies to any use of MS_LAZYTIME >>> has this as a downside. >>> >>> Does that make sense? >> >> Thanks, Ted. Got it. So, now we have: >> >> MS_LAZYTIME (since Linux 3.20) > > "since Linux 4.0". D'oh! Yes, thanks. Fixed. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs