From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0166A7F51 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:28:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4969304032 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id N3qT1BIvUsF9FjHg for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54FDAE25.6080907@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:28:53 -0400 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: take XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL if suid removal is required References: <54F9DBAE.2070002@redhat.com> <20150306210927.GA13958@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20150306210927.GA13958@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner , Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On 3/6/15 4:09 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: ... >> Upgrade the lock to XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL in this case. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > > I believe Jan Kara has already addressed this problem in > this patchset: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-03/msg00051.html Ah, yes, that should fix it. Thanks Jan. Sorry for missing it. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs