From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771C97F54 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:44:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9368F8059 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id csQhlHCSE88BLAhc for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <550054D9.3010602@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:44:41 -0400 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: junk last entry in sf dir if name starts beyond dir size References: <54FDFEDC.5090106@sandeen.net> <1061986380.422955.1426008424991.JavaMail.zimbra@rvx.is> <54FF2BBF.7060404@sandeen.net> <410959445.428221.1426083973347.JavaMail.zimbra@rvx.is> In-Reply-To: <410959445.428221.1426083973347.JavaMail.zimbra@rvx.is> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Rui Gomes Cc: omar , xfs On 3/11/15 10:26 AM, Rui Gomes wrote: > Hello Eric, > > Thank you for the quick reply yesterday, I got to try the new patched version today, > and we have now a segmentation fault at a different stage of the repair \o/ > Full output plus gdb traceback in the attachment. If you have 4k sectors, you might need this patch from the list: [PATCH] xfs: superblock buffers need to be sector sized http://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=142476196802097&w=2 as it's not merged yet. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs