From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8A77F67 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:06:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CEEAC001 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LuK7dp6r3GPBe6jB for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <553EEB36.4080200@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:06:46 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Proposal/RFC: new metadata-specific UUID for V5 supers References: <553EB3D1.10602@sandeen.net> <20150427233754.GT21261@dastard> <553ED9D8.4050106@sandeen.net> <20150428012003.GS15810@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20150428012003.GS15810@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs-oss On 4/27/15 8:20 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > I think that labels are a far better way of dealing with this > problem. Get rid of the UUID mount checking (and hence the nouuid > mount option), and tell people to use by-label instead of by-uuid to > identify their filesystems when doing clones and snapshots. Labels > make it much easier for humans to identify the filesystem than > UUIDs... I suppose so. Withdrawn. ;) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs