From: Dewangga <dewanggaba@xtremenitro.org>
To: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Valid Benchmark Value & Methods
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 19:16:02 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554B5782.4040303@xtremenitro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2204700.QypQcg3ER3@merkaba>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Martin,
Thanks for your reply, yes I've read that link, but another question,
is noatime,nodiratime,etc still valid for performance tuning guidance?
Even the default mount options only "rw,inode64,seclabel,attr2".
Is it still increase the performance if the additional mount options
added?
On 5/7/2015 18:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015, 18:24:09 schrieb Dewangga:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm new on XFS and curious about any tune/tweak regarding XFS
>> filesystem on any raid array, non-raid, ssd or non-ssd. But, is
>> there any valid value to determine about the performance? At
>> least valid benchmark result (eg. using fio with some parameters,
>> or any method).
>>
>> Then, about bsize, sectsz, etc, is there any wiki/guidelines how
>> to set them on a right way?
>
> Ok, one additional thing:
>
> Use recent kernel and userspace utilities.
>
> Cause defaults are updated sometimes and with recent tools you get
> best out of box experience.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVS1eBAAoJEF1+odKB6YIxyQwH/Am1bC+YhydmoWOknAMgjrEI
3mTmeUu0O/p90+DsXPS04zjht18XzsZKVTASVraPgPcrgzoqlHtHflK55++YIKp2
SLbFI2IexNLNbffyUgM7NCCpEjKZLkN8v4eNP2ylSgQqK4DTzwWPDypF16FX/rlc
2WuvQINR345i8rwjPryMbZAHiCem3ewYssx34jfH5NPh9CoRo1mnuFCEHzz9IG3L
4u0Z7zTKHZQPDaRzC3MVO5wOZNelnWXcP2TwiDJF3LgdEzWTinQGthEKy5ytSPPI
xRZvJnzUvXWt6JNuWCUjtIUV3ODhBctfkk200wvMUyBdQg7Zo+OiXXOyaA24GsU=
=wHBL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 11:24 Valid Benchmark Value & Methods Dewangga
2015-05-07 11:48 ` Martin Steigerwald
2015-05-07 11:49 ` Martin Steigerwald
2015-05-07 12:16 ` Dewangga [this message]
2015-05-07 13:54 ` Martin Steigerwald
2015-05-07 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2015-05-08 5:53 ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554B5782.4040303@xtremenitro.org \
--to=dewanggaba@xtremenitro.org \
--cc=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox