From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CAD7F54 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 15:41:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8F9AC004 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EokGjDDKBegss183 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t48Kev61029568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:40:57 -0400 Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t48KesW7026301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:40:55 -0400 Message-ID: <554D1F56.7030209@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 15:40:54 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] allow UUID changes on V5/CRC filesystems List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-oss Ok, here's the next round. This has been through some degree of testing, though I still probably owe some xfstests testcases. Dave, in the end I went ahead and kept the sb_uuid name and meaning in the same superblock location; this does mean we touch all verifiers etc, but it makes for more consistency, IMHO. Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs