From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1AB7F3F for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:02:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDB98F8070 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ph.de-nserver.de (mail-ph.de-nserver.de [85.158.179.214]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id re6JGRrI2z3k4neY (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5551EBB2.9010508@profihost.ag> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:01:54 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: any chance for xfs shrinking? List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Hi, while cloud / vms usage become more and more popular and qemu now also offers memory hot add and unplug, cpu hot add and unplug, we still suffer from a missing xfs shrink. I would like to continue to use XFS as it is a rock solid base since around 10 years for us. But one missing piece in variable ressource usage for us is disk shrinking. Is there any chance to get an xfs online shrinking? Thanks! Greets, Stefan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs