From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: set XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT in xfs_attr_get
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:59:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B07496.9060207@redhat.com> (raw)
It's entirely possible for userspace to ask for an xattr which
does not exist.
Normally, there is no problem whatsoever when we ask for such
a thing, but when we look at an obfuscated metadump image
on a debug kernel with selinux, we trip over this ASSERT in
xfs_da3_path_shift():
*result = -ENOENT; /* we're out of our tree */
ASSERT(args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT);
It (more or less) only shows up in the above scenario, because
xfs_metadump obfuscates attr names, but chooses names which
keep the same hash value - and xfs_da3_node_lookup_int does:
if (((retval == -ENOENT) || (retval == -ENOATTR)) &&
(blk->hashval == args->hashval)) {
error = xfs_da3_path_shift(state, &state->path, 1, 1,
&retval);
IOWS, we only get down to the xfs_da3_path_shift() ASSERT
if we are looking for an xattr which doesn't exist, but we
find xattrs on disk which have the same hash, and so might be
a hash collision, so we try the path shift. When *that*
fails to find what we're looking for, we hit the assert about
XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT.
Simply setting XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT in xfs_attr_get solves this
rather corner-case problem with no ill side effects. It's
fine for an attr name lookup to fail.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
index 3349c9a..ff06557 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ xfs_attr_get(
args.value = value;
args.valuelen = *valuelenp;
+ /* Entirely possible to look up a name which doesn't exist */
+ args.op_flags = XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT;
lock_mode = xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(ip);
if (!xfs_inode_hasattr(ip))
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 4:59 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-07-23 5:20 ` [PATCH] xfs: set XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT in xfs_attr_get Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B07496.9060207@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox